I'm not talking about the static pressure (air pressure in the font). I'm talking about the head pressure. The difference in height between the...
@Erwin That's exactly what I was suggesting in post #25. It absolutely would work, but the needed lower aperture to maintain *just* fuel flowing...
Still possible, with something like rocksett, high temperature sleeve retainer, or, if that fails, high temp loctite and a threaded interface....
Valid points. I have to wonder how hard it would be to add the metering rod. Drill a hole in the center of the bottom of the eccentric block,...
Something to be aware of: with the "lower collar" removed, your fuel pickup is slightly higher, and you'll start sucking air before the fuel is...
Absolutely understandable. Please keep us posted on results! Now that I'm reasonably sure I know how it works, I think I will keep an eye out for...
Ok, THAT makes much more sense, as it would behave exactly the same as the originally posted patent, and mesh well with Dashwood's first...
Larger generator orifice was probably to account for the leaner AFR created by the "atomizer" style FA tube. That really is such a strange...
Of note, this is my reference for one that has a removable lower collar. But it looks like the eccentric block is one of the "down sealing" ones,...
Man, that is REALLY weird, having a gap at the top. If the FA tube followed the patent (even without the needle), it would act like an emulsion...
Let's try to stay on topic. I appreciate the caution, but I'm wanting to sort out how this particular design works, as is the topic of this...
Created an account, just to poke at this thread. Looking at getting a 226, because I want a dual fuel option, and I like their look more than the...
Separate names with a comma.
