Coleman 290A converted to paraffin

Discussion in '290, 290A' started by presscall, Sep 14, 2023.

  1. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    3E01EF2F-F346-4876-B6DD-7DDD83621A3E.jpeg


    Candidate was an angler’s well-used example, reeking of pump petrol.

    B95C8C45-4842-4897-A418-4D349400786F.jpeg


    Surface rust and nothing deeper, but after rust removal, stripping the remains of the dark green livery (decal carefully peeled off for re-use) and a priming coat I added a black vent from a scrap 295 and re-painted the tank in gloss black.

    The generator was already paraffin-friendly in having twin brass coils, unlike the 295’s.

    D893E5D1-DF53-4698-BC3E-1707130D38F0.jpeg


    The jet tip though was a stock 0.009 inch orifice. I had a spare jet marked ‘C’ (from a Coleman 335 I think) with a 0.008 inch orifice, so I used that as a more suitable jet for burning paraffin.

    44619471-DD25-4FEB-88A1-5F1925B63848.jpeg


    With no use for the air inlet on the fuel pickup, there to give the air feed for ‘easy start’ on Coleman fuel, I blocked it up with a strip of brass and epoxy - doctored pickup on the left alongside the usual configuration.

    C9D1E8FE-29AF-4A1C-9F5D-B7289496F6F8.jpeg


    Of course, a priming cup was now needed, another project for my stock of spent cartridge cases.

    09D017A3-4554-4646-A630-6A72FB6C1E4E.jpeg


    Silbrazed together and nickel plated.

    B2FFCA6A-54B0-4A99-A951-7AE7885C5323.jpeg

    7C706F74-4ED5-4465-96D3-FDA471A274F1.jpeg


    Slots cut to ‘cascade’ priming meths from one to another when filled at one.

    992367A4-F1F1-44DA-9C88-E6706847D2B1.jpeg


    To remind me of the fuel, I added the ‘Kero’ script - ‘Paraffin’ would have been more of a challenge to fabricate!

    81277709-7FDD-4853-9A9F-1FDF17122118.jpeg


    Priming.

    BF3380CB-B26D-48AB-9023-6E05B055A0D1.jpeg



    Ignition.



    It burns strongly and the lantern’s facility to dial down the brightness is retained.



    I nearly forgot … another concession to the new fuel, bigger mantles than the Coleman 21 stock ones. The Chinese Butterfly mantles (350/500cp rated) work well.

    847A9E8B-5C6A-4D04-BE27-C9FC4D026886.jpeg

    John
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2023
  2. JEFF JOHNSON

    JEFF JOHNSON United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    16,876
    Location:
    Shetland Islands UK..
    A splendid conversion!:thumbup::clap::clap::thumbup:
     
  3. ROBBO55

    ROBBO55 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2014
    Messages:
    4,424
    Location:
    Somersby, New South Wales, Australia
    Nicely done John :thumbup:
     
  4. Tony Press

    Tony Press Netherlands Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11,101
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    Nice work, John.

    I'm wondering with those bigger mantles, and the twin-coiled generator, whether it would still run, at a higher cp output, with the 0.009" jet?


    Cheers

    Tony
     
  5. Walkop Australia

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2020
    Messages:
    955
    Location:
    Bathurst, Australia
    An interesting project. Thanks for all the details.
     
  6. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    @Tony Press
    I wasn’t keen on retaining the 0.009 inch jet Tony, largely because of using multi-fuel camping stoves, where the hierarchy of jet orifice sizes is as you know well established - lpg biggest; gasoline middle; paraffin smallest - and critical.

    Additionally, you’ll see from the video where I reduce the brightness then turn it back to full the surge of fuel vapour temporarily results in a halo of burning outside the mantle. It quickly settles down but it suggests the margin of correct combustion is narrow and with the 0.008 inch jet I seem to be at the optimum point.

    I ran the lantern last night for an hour or so and it’s one of the brightest I have, so greater output isn’t required and the gain in reduced fuel consumption will be welcome.

    Theory aside, likely I’ll try the larger jet to test my assertion on overpowering of mantles.

    John
     
  7. Tony Press

    Tony Press Netherlands Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11,101
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    John

    The theory is good.

    Cheers

    Tony
     
  8. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    @Tony Press
    I tested the original jet and there’s no overpowering of the mantles, but no noticeable increase in light output either. What I noticed though was the (slightly) lingering flame with the larger of the two jets on shut-off.



    The smaller jet results in immediate cessation of burning in the mantles, suggesting that the clearance of the pricker is significantly finer, effectively preventing any residual fuel vapour from passing. I’ll keep the ‘C’ jet installed, on balance.

    I realise that in my haste to try the lantern on paraffin I didn’t replace the heat shield and its retaining clip. The shield’s meant to prevent overheating of the plasic component numbered 40 in the patent drawing and the shrader valve it operates …

    C42A0360-4A5E-4F23-B811-D27D85D61881.jpeg


    … this

    FCDA4E85-A1E9-4C7D-98A2-224878DD7C27.jpeg

    A5741DF1-2CCC-4C53-A31D-0C68F070C204.jpeg


    I replaced the heat shield and clip, which usefully prevents the spirit cup from destroying the mantles if the lantern were to be upended. I’ve also reduced the height of the spirit cup to still create a capacity more than sufficient to prime the lantern.

    2431CE82-5D16-4390-9742-CF0E56FF209C.jpeg

    B82F65AC-319F-4428-AB00-EDD1B57A13D4.jpeg

    John
     
  9. ROBBO55

    ROBBO55 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2014
    Messages:
    4,424
    Location:
    Somersby, New South Wales, Australia
    An interesting conversion and post . :thumbup:
     
  10. JohnL

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2019
    Messages:
    57
    Location:
    Perth
    Great work @presscall John!
    I’m rummaging through my shed as we speak to find a similar 290 and put it under the knife. :content:
    Cheers
     
  11. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    Thanks @JohnL!
    It’s a handy lamp to have.

    The controllable light output is useful to dial back the dazzle and being able to transport the lamp with fuel in the tank thanks to the Coleman’s positive fuel shut-off saves having to decant it into a container and re-fill it in camp, as I’ve had to do with other lamps and stoves. Kero works out cheaper than the original fuel too of course.

    Cheers.
     
  12. MYN

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,861
    Location:
    Malaysia
    That's an excellent conversion done.
    I'd figure the 0.009" jet would be pretty marginal for kero unless the generator is of the Preston loop type.
    I would have use a 0.008" or at most, 0.0085" jet to be on the safe side too.
     

Share This Page